Tell Me Unc is “black by popular demand”. Following time spent in the tribal lands of the Kulin Nations, Unc has taken up the writing stick we now know as blogging.
Sitting on the side line as a spectator can be awfully boring after a while, especially when issues of world importance to Australia’s Aboriginal populations are being trampled over and ignored like never before.
Two recent issues have raised my interest not because they are controversial but because they are just wrong-headed from a moral standpoint.
The first is the continuing jingoistic razzmatazz surrounding the 26th of January. The second is the Recognise campaign.
Lets be clear about both of these issues. Aboriginal people and an ever-increasing population of mainstream Australians, are moving to the same position as Aboriginal people have held since it was first proposed by the New South Wales State Government in 1808 – that a remembrance day marking the arrival of the first fleet.
Not to be confused with Cook, who was sussin the place out in 1770 and went on to plant a flag on “Possession Island”. We don’t even know if this event is true.
Unc has been to Possession Island and it would take an effort to get out of the Endeavour pitching in a heavy sea. Then get a flag pole into a smaller boat and make the effort to row to the island against a strong current in a naturally difficult passage of water in the Torres Strait. Then plant a flag. It’s questionable.
All of this after repairing the endeavour in Cooktown. Cook would have wanted to get outa there and back home ASAP. The phrase “I did but see her passing by” comes to mind.
The 26th of January has gone through a few different titles, Foundation day, Anniversary day ANA Day. Following Federation in 1901 the States and Territories could not agree on a day, until 1935. At that point they agreed that the 26th January would be known as Australia Day.
But it was not until 1994 that it was a public holiday in all states and territories. And that was the beginning of the marketing campaign by the Australia Day Council. Millions of dollars of taxpayers money has been spent on a what is now an ugly nationalistic campaign. Where people wrap themselves in flags, get flag tats on their faces, get the esky full of grog go down to the beach, drive around in cars with flags out the windows, in some kind of nationalist fever.
This nationalism is dangerous in any society. It has taken 20 years to get to where it is now, what will the next 20 years bring?
Aboriginal people will still call the day Invasion Day, Survival Day, a day of mourning. They are never ever going to agree to celebrating it. The problem for Australia Day Council is that, as the population of Aboriginal people is rapidly increasing and there is no change, more generations of Aboriginal people will be on the streets every 26th January until it changes. How will the diplomats, quaffing Australian wine and Australian crayfish explain to their guests? When they ask the obvious question about Australia’s first nation people
Imagine how Aboriginal people and supporters of Aboriginal people felt, when they saw vision on TV of the convoy of trucks sporting flags outside the cabins of their trucks as they delivered hay to the farmers, who lost properties and feed stock in the recent bush fires. Watching a convoy of trucks brandishing flags honking horns with all the fanfare and nationalism of a Nazi parade, with full television coverage on the 26th of January. It would have made them all reach for the sick bag.
The morning television shows were no better, full as it was with their jingoism take on the day. Those two guys with their washing machine van for the homeless and their corporate T shirts and all their branding. Unc couldn’t help wondering about the people who have been working most of their lives to to try and solve the problems of homelessness who are rarely recognised. Lets see if they do what Les Twentyman has done in his life in a few years time. Those dudes will end up in the corporate world, you just know it.
To me we dont need a day that celebrates the dispossession of Aboriginal people’s land. Full stop. If we need to celebrate a national day then pick a day that symbolises something like the sprig of wattle. The first of September would be good.
It reminds me of Willian Barak a Kulin man, who said “when the wattle blooms will be my time to pass on.”
The second of my gripes, is the Recognise campaign. Australia is the only Commonwealth country that does not have a treaty with its Indigenous people. Not many people in the country know this. Not many people in the world know this.
The Recognise people running the campaign will poo poo what Unc writes. They will marginalise a view anti to the view they have. It is well know strategy used countless times by Government where they select a group of people to lead a debate to an outcome they want.
Recognise is no different to what has happened in the past; like native title not being land rights. People are fed up with this approach.
Recognise is not a treaty. Aboriginal people want a treaty that gives them rights to land and everything that goes with that land. They want education rights, to have a decent education in language if they want in schools, they want a better health system like all Australians, they want housing rights.
Recognise will not give that. Recognise is yet another diversion in the life of Aboriginal Australia.
The Recognise campaign is a lot like the 26 Jan marketing campaign. The Government will delay the campaign until they have enough of the population agreeing to it.
The government want Recognise because they don’t want a treaty. Big business dosen’t want it so the government doesn’t want it.
The people inducted into the campaign will have people believe that this is a first step to a treaty and that recognition in the Constitution will lead to better recognition of indigenous rights. Well that just does not make sense.
The anti-recognise campaign is gaining momentum, like the anti-26 January campaigns its just that we have to be prepared for a long struggle.
Given that Tracker Magazine journalist Chris Graham is a Walkley and Human Rights Award-winning Journalist, what he writes about can be taken as well researched and well presented, unlike the lazy journalism from the bogan alumni at the mainstream media outlets in the country. Graham gets straight to the issues with all the facts.
His recent contribution to Tracker magazine, on the election voting pattern of indigenous voters is interesting reading.
What is interesting is something that the vast majority of indigenous people know and have been saying among themselves for many years. We won’t kowtow to anything other than self-determination. Governments and agencies who believe that kicking a football around is a panacea for everything indigenous, have been reading too much Brothers Grimm .
It has always has been and always will be self-determination, which will take the country and indigenous affairs forward. No amount of sport, taking kids out of their communities to flash schools, while leaving others behind, wasteful training programs, unnecessary job networks, will ever have outcomes of self-determination and happiness for indigenous people.
The new NIC set up by Prime Minister Abbott is the death-knell of the failed congress model, set up as a result of the trashing of ATSIC by a bipartisan parliament. Chris Graham makes the point that of the 6,000 members of the replacement National Aboriginal congress, only 809 voted in the recent election held in Cairns.
I have travelled to more communities and sat down with more Aboriginal and Islander people than most and I have not found a community person that is a member, they don’t even know about it and don’t want to know about it. The Tracker magazine article is below.
Election 2013: The downside of democracy
by Chris Graham
One of the features of a modern democracy is that apart from getting the government we deserve, we’re also supposed to get the government that the majority of us want. Like Communism, it’s great in theory. But also like Communism, it’s often not so good in practice. At least, it’s not if you happen to be a minority group who has long been denied the right to elect your own leaders. And that explains how Aboriginal Australians awoke on Sunday morning to find they had a new ‘Prime Minister for Indigenous Affairs’, a pledge Tony Abbott delivered during the 2013 election campaign.
One problem – no-one, including within the media, ever stopped to ask Aboriginal people if they actually wanted a ‘Prime Minister for Indigenous Affairs’, and in particular whether or not they wanted Abbott. As it turns out, they apparently don’t. Believe it or not, there is a simple way to get a broad feel for Aboriginal voting aspirations. All you need do is look at booths around Australia that are identifiably Aboriginal.
That mainstream media are too lazy to invest the time and do this (it took me just four hours to analyse 48 identifiably Aboriginal booths) speaks some volumes about how effectively the rights and interests of Aboriginal people are served by that other pillar of democracy – a free and informed press.In any case, here are the facts.
The average vote directed to Labor in identifiably Aboriginal communities outside the Northern Territory (we’ll come to the NT seat of Lingiari shortly, because it’s a whole other train wreck) was 71 percent. The swing against the Coalition in some booths climbed as high as 40 percent, and averaged around 12 percent. That’s more than three times the national average (a 3.51 percent swing to the Coalition). And that’s in booths that overwhelmingly already voted Labor in the first place.
To put that into some perspective for you, if a swing of 12 percent were to occur against either party in mainstream Australia, both would have been reduced to around 25 seats in a 150-seat parliament, aka ‘minor party status’.One of the most interesting seats – at least from the black perspective – is Leichhardt, the electorate that takes in all of the Cape York Aboriginal communities.
Cape York, of course, is home to Noel Pearson, another self-styled ‘Aboriginal Prime Minister’ who has for more than a decade been advising government directly on Aboriginal policy, whilst repeatedly claiming that only a conservative Coalition government can deliver real change. If you look at the Coalition’s election statement on Indigenous Australians, most of its policies come from Pearson. But it seems the good citizens of Cape York don’t share Pearson’s views on the way forward, due in no small part, I suspect, to the reality that after more than a decade of Pearson dominance, their lives have not improved.
The tiny community of Lockhart River saw a two party preferred vote to Labor of almost 90 percent, with a swing against the Coalition of 40 percent. Kowanyama saw 87 percent of the vote directed to Labor. Bamaga and Napranum both delivered 72 percent to Labor. The only Aboriginal community which actually voted in favour of the Coalition was Pearson’s home town of Hope Vale, and even then, it was only by a margin of four percent while still delivering a seven percent swing against the Coalition.
The booth at Aurukun – a large community where Abbott visited last year to help build a school library – also saw a swing to the Coalition (10 percent). It sounds encouraging for Abbott… until you understand that 76 percent of the two party preferred vote went to Labor. In communities outside Queensland, the result was the same, and sometimes worse. In Toomelah on the NSW border, 82 percent of the vote went to Labor, despite the fact that across the rest of seat of Parkes the Coalition member won 72 percent of the two party vote.
At Wallaga Lake on the NSW South Coast, 94 percent of votes on a two party basis were directed to Labor. In Wilcannia – a town where 20 percent of the community is non Aboriginal – 62 percent of the vote still went to Labor, with a 14 percent swing against the Coalition. Of the 48 identifiably Aboriginal booths surveyed, only eight of them bucked the trend and delivered more than 50 percent of the two party vote to the Coalition, and six of those were in Northern Territory bush booths. And that’s the other train wreck. The seat of Lingiari takes in all of the 73 Aboriginal communities affected by the Northern Territory intervention. At the 2007 election, there were massive swings against the Coalition, amid promises by Labor to water the legislation down.
When Labor won office and then sat on it’s hands, there were massive swings back to the Coalition in 2010, with personal swings against Labor in Aboriginal booths of up to 70 percent. Now, in 2013, there have been wild swings all over the place – some to Labor, and some to the Coalition. But the underlying trend in Lingiari has been to retreat back to Labor. So what does it all mean? A couple of things.
Firstly, the wild swings over the past few elections in Aboriginal communities show that while black voters favour Labor, they are not wholey wedded to any single party.
Secondly, any suggestion that most Aboriginal people LIKE Labor is nonsense. They don’t. On most fronts, the ALP’s policies virtually match the Coalition’s – bipartisanship is only ever a good thing when you actually know what you’re doing.
Thirdly, by any reasonable analysis, Aboriginal people overwhelmingly do not want Tony Abbott as the ‘Prime Minister for Indigenous Affairs’, and at a punt the Coalition’s stated election policies probably helped solidify that view. Only two of those policies ever got serious mainstream airing in the course of the election campaign.
The first was Abbott’s plan to appoint a new National Indigenous Council, a policy tried and failed the last time the Coalition were in power. The NIC is a group of hand-picked blackfellas who will advise the Prime Minister directly on Aboriginal policy. It will be headed by former Labor Party president Warren Mundine – a man who has never been elected to any Aboriginal leadership position – with support from Pearson and Professor Marcia Langton. Pearson and Langton, in their defence, are formidable intellects. But they also happen to be possibly the only two people in the nation less popular than Mundine among Aboriginal people.
So much for a love of democracy from a group of people – conservatives – whose synapses would start misfiring if you ever threatened their basic rights. The only other policy to get any mainstream coverage – and only then by accident in the dying days of the campaign – was incoming Treasurer Joe Hockey’s admission that more than $40 million would be cut from Aboriginal Legal Aid.
The area has been grossly underfunded for two decades, and Labor continued that during its first term in office. It finally lifted funding marginally a few years ago – at a time when jailing rates reached stratospheric dimensions – and now the Coalition is planning to axe it again. It’s puzzling how this fits Abbott’s stated mantra of ‘ruling for all Australians’, unless of course you accept that managing a population of blackfellas is much easier if you can confine most of them to penal institutions. To sum it all up, the political process – and the election – has not worked for Aboriginal Australians.
They were damned if they did and damned if they didn’t, and in fact most didn’t – half the Aboriginal population eligible to vote is not enrolled, which speaks some volumes in it’s own right. But not all volumes, because the black parliamentary system is currently working no better than the white one.
During the election campaign, the National Congress of Australia’s First Peoples – the new body which is elected by Aboriginal people and aims to represent the views of Aboriginal people nationally – released the results of its own bi-annual elections. Of the 6,000 eligible members, just 809 cast a vote. It’s a bitterly disappointing result, by any measure, and proof that Aboriginal people are increasing disengaging from any political process, not just the mainstream ones. There’s a simple reason for this. Aboriginal people want self-determination, and every step Australia takes – from an Abbott hand-picked council to constitutional recognition within a document designed to deny Aboriginal sovereignty – is a step further from where Aboriginal people want to be.
Genuine self determination – where a distinct people choose their own leaders, make their own laws, govern their own lives – never comes easily, nor quickly. It took Australia more than 100 years to even make a dent in it. It is, however, the only solution that has ever worked for nations facing the same problems we face – the displacement and brutalization of a First Peoples. In New Zealand, Maori have seven seats (10 percent of the parliament) which sit over the entire country which anyone can contest, but in which only Maori can vote. There’s also a variety of models that have worked successfully in Canada and the US, where First Nations people have varying degrees of autonomy over their communities.
These other nations, of course, have not collapsed into civil war. Indeed, by comparison to Australia, First Nations peoples in Canada, the US and New Zealand are way ahead in every single social indicator. They don’t have world record rates of curable diseases, such as trachoma and rheumatic heart disease. They don’t have suicide rates that are the highest on earth. They also don’t jail their First Peoples at world record rates. Those honours, of course, are reserved for Australia, a nation that continues to stray further and further from the only real solution – self-determination.
Tony Abbott can quite rightly claim to have a mandate to govern Australia. But he has nothing even closely resembling a mandate to claim to be ‘Prime Minister for Indigenous Affairs’. For some reason, I doubt that’s going to stop him claiming it, nor prevent the mainstream media circus from blindly embracing and reporting it. Democracy, it seems, isn’t necessarily for everyone.
Chris Graham is a Walkley Award and Human Rights Award winning journalist, and the former managing editor of Tracker magazine. He’s now a freelance writer based in Sydney.
Parliamentary privilege is a legal immunity enjoyed by members of parliament, in which elected members are granted protection against civil or criminal liability for actions done or statements made in the course of their parliament duties.
Parliamentary privilege is controversial because of its potential for abuse; a member can use privilege to make damaging allegations that would ordinarily be discouraged by defamation laws, without first determining whether those allegations have a strong foundation.
Unc would argue that Bess Price made an error of judgement in attacking individual people for their affiliations and for their opinions in the NT Assembly. It should follow that those people have a right of reply in the parliamentary process. It is not that Bess should not be able to present her views, it is what she said under the privilege of parliament.
Unc would argue that the material in the address was not part of her function, and therefore breached the immunity of privilege given to members of parliament.
Hiding behind privilege, and dismissing everyone that has a disagreement with your views as left-wing, or worse, in support of violence against women, is not what we need from a member elected to represent. So also is the trashy language, referencing white people in the same way as white folk talk about black people. Racism has no place in a democracy. Democracy has made it possible for Bess to take a seat in the NT Assembly.
Unc’s view is that there is nothing to be gained by anyone in the Pan Aboriginal movement defaming other Aborigines, who have worked hard all their public lives and have worked tirelessly to lift the participation rate of Aboriginal people in society and give them and their families a better life.
Methinks that the pressure by critics, including Bob “Northern Myth” Gosford, Chris Graham, Chris Sarra, Larissa Behrendt, Marlene Hodder, Barbara Shaw, Koori Radio and others including community people in Central Australia, are taking their toll on the Aboriginal members. The people are entitled to feel duped by their representatives, who in good faith voted for Bess. Now, under parliamentary sanction, it in effect tars them all with the same brush of racism.
Bess Price owes her success to a clique of white journalists and editors in the mainstream press. By contrast, Barbara Shaw from Alice Springs Mount Nancy town camp has never been given the same press, simply because she opposed the Intervention. Barb Shaw has not been on Q&A or had glowing articles written about her in The Australian. Barb Shaw has lived all her life in town camps and has the knowledge and respect of many people. The ABC, which prides itself on it unbiased presentation has shown that it will always go with the flow and is prepared to present a view of Aboriginal Australia is through the eyes of a single person
Bess Price statement read into Hansard is a cry for help from Government to do more. It’s a message to Aboriginal people and the people and businesses who are living off the misery of Aboriginal people. It’s a message to the Elders, store owners, shires, councils, pubs, road houses, cattle stations, tourist operators, the mining companies, footy teams, educators, health centres, and bureaucrats, barricaded behind chain wire fences. The message is you all bear some responsibility for the carnage.
Bess Prices concerns are real, lets not forget that. It makes no sense to talk economic enterprise, in these communities and towns, spending millions of dollars on fly in fly out programs, when the problem is that there is not enough water to have a decent shower. Not enough food to have a decent feed. Not enough teachers to have a decent education. Not enough health workers to have decent health. Not enough activities or jobs.
Unc can understand the frustrations of Bess. What is happening is a national shame. Every death or youth suicide, of an Aboriginal person caused by petrol sniffing, by violence, or by drunk driving with family in the car “shames us all”.
In the Territory, it seems to be easier to get a change to the drinking register, take kids away again (that idea came a gutser) boot camps, and now mandatory rehabilitation centres for 12 weeks, effectively jailing people, then it is to get real change to grog laws.
The Territory Assembly reminds me of ATSIC, it appears that blackfellas are on one side and bureaucrats are on the other. They are prepared to let blackfellas fight among themselves. It’s a distraction that allows them to fund their pet projects in Darwin.
I have not lived in the Territory for a few years. Can someone tell Unc what measures have the Aboriginal members of the Territory Government done to shut down the animal bars, prevent the grog flowing to towns, communities and to the town camps? The rivers of grog still flow even though some of the Intervention measures were well received.
Is this a good thing? Some parts of the Intervention were and are needed. But dis-empowering men and taking away their money is draconian and unnecessary. Unless you have lived on community and grown up witnessing this (Unc has walked the walk and so has Bess), unless you have seen the turmoil caused by grog, you have no idea of the real situation. Bess is like all of us who have witnessed the carnage and feel that nothing gets done.
Grog and Aboriginal people, has been a problem since the ships sailed into Botany Bay 1789. It’s ironic that people coming by boat are now classified as illegal, while the people that sailed down Botany Bay in 1789 are “settlers” and convicts. What did Aboriginal people learn from that early experience? They were exposed to rum, witnessed the brutal floggings of convicts, “Yeah” a great model for Australia’s Aborigines.
History will judge the Intervention as being a policy failure made on the run, it is ABC “lateline policy” and an ABC /SBS view of Australia who both have a “sense of entitlement”, to promote their brand of Australian culture.
The answer to the problems is not more papers from right or left think tanks for that matter, or weekly stories from journalists hunting for a Walkley Award.
The goal posts have changed in politics in Australia; we now have even right-wing think tanks and politicians agreeing on policies that they previously stayed away from, such as Gay Rights, Aboriginal issues, parental leave, NDIS. It is only recently that the conservatives have shown any real interest in everyday Aboriginal affairs. Yes they can claim Fraser and land rights, but that was already in place. The same as they will claim NDIS and parental leave.
It has always been people like Frank Hardy, the trade unions, labour, and recently the Greens leading the way, dragging the conservatives along. They were nowhere to be seen on Aboriginal issues until recently.
Sometimes Bess. “It is better to keeps ones mouth shut and be thought a fool, then to open it and leave no doubt”.
Blackfellas got the result they wanted in the Territory elections, as people voted on tribal lines and for the continuation of the Intervention. Black politicians and their “white advisers” cleverly manipulated the communities into voting CLP not fully understanding that they were voting to put their families in to “concentration camps and gulags”. They were led to believe the policy of prison farms was a whole law and order policy approach to fix the problems of fighting and drinking.
Blackfellas should know by now that when the CLP talk about law and order, they are not talking about the whitefellas that commit crimes, they are talking about the blackfellas on the streets of Darwin, Katherine, Tennant Creek, Bagot and Alice Springs.
Sources close to Tell Me Unc reported that a voting booth at Yuendumu was closed down because of the continued fighting in the community. The source told Unc that one of the electorate has around 5,000 registered voters and only 2,400 voted. So much for democracy. It is clear that blackfellas don’t have an understanding of how important the vote is, or they did not vote because they did not have a family affiliation.
The disempowering of community councils and the move to super shires has had an effect on the vote for the ALP. The community councils were the go-to places for people in their community and gave people a sense of self-determination, of being able to help themselves and plan for their communities future. That was all taken away, and on top of the intervention, people either did not vote, or turned to the CLP to punish the ALP. The community councils were political structures in their own right and sometimes outsiders had difficuilty in dealing with that arrangement.
The ALP lost their ability to talk through the councils to the mob, and did not understand the culture. The CLP were very well organised; they were able to recruit Aboriginal women to their team who were promotors of the Intervention, supported the oppressive policies of the CLP and could exploit divisions between blackfellas. It’s the oldest political game in the book, find the prejudice and press the button.
The ALP could be in for a long time in the wilderness. They have to win back the trust and counter the black bigotry and racism of the so called “real blackfellas”. When a good hard working member like Karl Hampton is done over by a black politician using language from the Pauline Hanson song book, then it is time to stand up and be counted.
It is not all darkness; the ALP should remember that darkness is followed by the light of day, and just before the dawn, heroes are born. The Irish peasantry have a great proverb and a saying to inspire hope under diverse circumstances. Remember, they say, “ the darkest hour of all, is the hour before day”.
Terry Mills, Bess Price and Alison Anderson are not heroes, nor are they messiahs that will not take their families to the Promised Land. They will lead them to the gulags and concentration camps of the prison farms of the Northern Territory.
Bess Price’s comments about White Blackfellas will one day come back to haunt her. What goes around comes around, in Aboriginal politics.
It is a racial comment and out of step with the Racial Discrimination Act. It is unlawful for a person to do any act involving a distinction, exclusion, restriction or preference based on race, colour, descent or national or ethnic origin which has the purpose or effect of nullifying or impairing the recognition, enjoyment or exercise, on an equal footing, of any human right or fundamental freedom in the political, economic, social, cultural or any other field of public life.
The vilification is common and one we have come to expect from those Aborigines who consider their own people with a light skin colour are a lesser social class than themselves. It is used to cower others and to gain an advantage in their work place, community or on the governance committee they may sit on.
If the comments can be considered ‘fair comment’, then they are not construed as racial vilification. But these comments are unprincipled and lack understanding and substance. You be the judge.
Racial discrimination is when a person is treated less favorably than another person in a similar situation because of their race, colour, descent, national or ethnic origin or immigrant status.
Trashing the good will that existed with Amnesty International is not a way forward. Amnesty, like many organisations before them, will go into their shell and wait until the Aboriginal movement becomes more mature and rises above the sandpit of kindergarten politics. I sincerely hope that is not the case and that Amnesty continue to work with the people who face the most discrimination. They are the many thousands of people opposed to the Intervention and living under the most draconian and racist period of the modern era.
To understand the Bess Price comments we have to take a look at history. Central Australia, where she comes from, was settled long after Tasmania, where Rodney Dillon of Amnesty’s heritage lies.
Bess Price comes from a group of Aborigines who are rich in land and rich in culture, simply because they were settled by the white folk long after the devastation of the invasion of Tasmania by sealers and then as a penal colony.
To not know about that history shows ignorance of the Aboriginal struggle for rights in Tasmania and of why Rodney Dillon and the Tasmanian Aborigines are a different skin colour.
It’s easy for an Aboriginal person with their language, stories and culture to slag off at the Aborigines that have fair skin, who don’t speak language, are from stolen generations and have not experienced ceremony.
It is well known in the Territory that Bess Price has political aspirations, she has learnt from the Pauline Hanson and John Howard song book, and is dog whistling to those voters on the margins.
Bess Price is not the only Aboriginal person that uses this kind of language and discrimination. There are others running around this country doing a great disservice to the whole Aboriginal population of this country. Some head local and state boards and national boards. Their bullying, discrimination and the playing of the race card against other Aborigines and Torres Strait Islanders is breathtaking.
Spare a thought for the many dedicated campaigners who marched the streets, got jailed and beaten up, all for the cause of Aboriginal people’s rights. The trade unions played a substantial role with funding rallies and international lobbying.
They forged the road to make it possible for Aboriginal people to have a health service, legal services, media services, enter universities, get a decent education, enter parliament, have land councils, co-operatives, enterprises; they set the ground work to get the land back. Frank Hardy would be turning in his grave.
The comment was a distasteful & penicious remark from a person who aspires to sit in the Territory Government. It opens up a window to the colour debate to those in the mainstream media who now have an aboriginal person with extreme views based on colour. Mainstream media enjoy a story that highlights the kindergarten “sandpit politics” of Aboriginal Australia.
In a year celebrating the world’s Indigenous peoples, the Canadian Government, in its March budget, announced it would move to open Canada’s native reserves to private ownership.
Newspaper reports say legislation is in the pipeline to allow First Nations peoples to adopt voluntarily what for most Canadians is natural right; to own a house property.
In Australia, the Human Rights Commission’s Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Social Justice Commissioner Mick Gooda, marking International Day of the World’s Indigenous Peoples and the 2012 theme of Indigenous Media, Empowering Voices, played lip service to that aim when he said Australia’s Indigenous media outlets played a valuable role in challenging stereotypes. Read the release here
The lie to that statement is in the Government’s action in closing down the National Indigenous Television service (NITV) in what can only be described as an assimilation of Indigenous media, disempowering Indigenous voices. An entire Indigenous media outlet has been handed over to be run for us by mainstream media.
Government and SBS bureaucrats, working behind the scenes, orchestrated the move to SBS Television despite protests from the NITV board and independent operators.
Indigenous television now sits as part of the SBS/ABC multicultural policies. Banished and condemned forever to be marginalised and with the tag of ethnic in their own country, a country they once owned.
The SBS colonisation of Indigenous media flies in the face of the UN article 16 reference to Indigenous Broadcasting.
“Indigenous people have the right to establish their own media, in their own languages, and have access to all forms of non-Indigenous media without discrimination”
There were many problems in the way NITV was set up. One problem was underfunding; the Productivity Commission recommended that $92 Million over 5 years be invested. The Government funded $42Million over the same period. Mistakes were also made with how NITV negoiated with existing indigenous media, but these are normal teething problems for a complex new organisation. SBS went through them in treir early days, as did the ABC in a less complex media environment- all they had to do was set up some radio stations. That doesn’t mean that you undermine the principle of what Indigenous Media means, which is thatwe are in charge of it and we are responsible for it.
The principal function of SBS is to provide multilingual and multicultural radio and television services that inform, educate and entertain all Australians and, in doing so, reflect Australia’s multicultural society. The charter also says they will contribute to meeting the communications needs of Australia’s multicultural society, including ethnic, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities;
That does not give SBS, ABC or for that matter independent film makers the right to plunder Australia’s indigenous content and package it, then call it Indigenous Media.
I am not saying that Indigenous people should not be working at SBS/ABC or other mainstream media, or that their work is not good enough. But the potential is there for Indigenous people working in mainstream media and indigenous media to become invisible and for everyone to lose track of the real meaning of Indigenous Media.
It is not for the SBS and ABC management and boards to position themselves to determine the future of Australian overall culture, and what is good for us all. With SBS and ABC, the commitment to providing for all -Australians only seems to kick in for Aboriginal people if extra resources are provided, rather than being a fundamental commitment, like to provide Greek language programming for Greek Australians, or Doctor Who for Geek Australians.
Our difficulty insofar as Indigenous Australians are concerned is that in non metropolitan regions we don’t have the network to cover for their needs for the time being; we don’t have the facilities, both transmitters and frequencies, to broadcast to them.
Even though it is part of their charter they were not going to do it without more funding.
VAST spectrum is now used by SBS to carry NITV and ABC to deliver indigenous programs into remote areas, and it may look like they are meeting their charter. But putting but a set top box in a remote community, still doesn’t mean they have indigenous media.
The ABC told the Productivity Commission that it will continue discussions with Indigenous organisations about possible programming, training and development options in the digital environment. However the ABC indicated that it would not be able to carry an Indigenous television service. This is what they told the commission:
The ABC requires the entire spectrum allocated to it to provide a package of digital services that meets anticipated audiences need’s and enables the ABC to leverage content across its networks to achieve appropriate audiences reach, efficiency and effectiveness.
The ABC has no capacity to provide a multiplex ‘Piggy back’ style arrangement to third parties. It plans to use the digital spectrum allocated and will absorb the entire available spectrum.
They would say that wouldn’t they. Just look at the channels and spectrum that the ABC/SBS has between them and ask who is the loser.
Warehousing is the term bandied around. Both SBS and ABC should be put under the hammer and real spectrum carved off for Indigenous purposes, and that should be managed and operated by Indigenous people.
The Imparja spectrum will carry a second Indigenous channel that will cover some of the remote towns. Second prize to the remote communities who continue to be sent to the back of the queue as they attempt to bring more appropriate Indigenous content to their own people.
Mick Gooda said he welcomes the establishment of the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Strategic Dialogue Group (ATSISDG). Oh please, not another group of blackfella academics and experts.
They need to take off their rose colored glasses. Come down from the air-conditioned comfort of their offices, start walking the walk and get their hands dirty.
They should all have a gap year and go and work on an aboriginal community. Experience living under a blue tarp and have someone tell you the intervention is going to make your life better.
12 years ago Australia’s real Indigenous Media organisations agreed on a road map for the future. The Government partly funded a small element of that plan, and that was what became NITV. The road map still shows us the way and they should come back to that and work with Indigenous Media in good faith and a real intention, so we can succeed. Come on, get real.
It was low tide on the Cairns esplanade. The mud flats glistened in the early morning sun, the first of the boats carrying tourists to the Great Barrier Reef, made their way out of the inlet.
Small crabs and mud skippers entertained themselves chasing each other as the trumpet shellfish, left their zigzag trail in a slow march across the mud, like backpackers in search of themselves.
As I observed these low tide activities, my attention was drawn to an “old mate” sitting under a huge mango tree, reading the paper and enjoying the freshness and early morning sun. “Gonna be a hot one today he said”.
I looked down and noticed that he was been reading the story about the unveiling of statue of Shane Warne at the MCG. Warnie, I said. Yeah! “he was the best said old mate”
You know, he said. “I took a hat trick once” I know the feeling of taking a hat trick and making a hundred. Did both he said.
I remember the day I made a 124 not out. It was here in Cairns. I was playing in the schoolboys competition, it was great to get out of school on Friday afternoon to play cricket or footy.
I will always remember the day I made my first hundred. As I was walking off the ground, the captain held his players back and all the kids clapped as I left the ground. I will always remember that, he obviously had a good knowledge of the sportsman ship of the game.
When I got to school on the Monday morning, the principal had everyone on to the parade ground. Everyone listened as he went on a long address about sport and the participation of sport. He then went on about the Friday match and how there was a special presentation to me because I had broken all previous school records in making 124 not out. He then called me up and presented me with a new cricket bat. It was a real shame job standing there in front of the school and making a speech, I cant remember what I said.
It made me well known, in the school and I was made a house captain the next year. When I took the bat home, the old man got out the linseed oil and oiled it up every day for a week. That bat was my prized possession.
What happened after that? Did you play first grade cricket? No I said I was doing an apprenticeship and other things took over my life.
Tell me about the hat trick, I asked. Well he said, it was in Mount Isa. I was working out there on construction of the No 4 copper concentrator, there were some boys from Victoria who played cricket and asked if I was interested in playing.
I had not had a ball or bat in my hand for 15 years and I went down to training more to keep me off the grog and get some fitness. After a month of training, I began to get a bit fit and was bowling a mix of spin and some swing, just like Sir Garfield Sobers he could do that, and he was a hero of mine.
I started getting a few wickets and making a few runs. I was playing on turf for the first time and it took some getting used to, we used to also play on concrete matting wickets.
The day I took the hat trick was like yesterday. We were playing on turf that day, the opposition batted first. They started well and they began to get on top belting us about.
There was a couple of barrackers in the stand that day and they were a bit worse for wear, having a sip and thinking they were in bay 13 at the G. They began this chant. Give Bert a bowl. A few more over’s and the skipper was worn down by the spectators calling for me. He threw me the ball, and said bowl some off spin see how you go. I bowled a couple of over’s getting onto a good length and moving the ball.
At the start of my 3rd or 4th over, the skipper came running up from first slip, he reset the field and said. Pitch it up outside off stump its moving about a bit, let it drift in he may get a snick. I pitched it up and to my surprise the ball spun about half a meter and bowled him.
The wicket keeper came racing up and holding his hands apart said that ball moved this much indicating about half a meter. The boys in the crowd went off, they got their wicket. The next guy came in took his line, backed away and looked around all confident.
With a glint in his old eyes and gesturing with his hands he said. I bowled him a beautiful off spinner, plenty of air drifted it in and bowled him. Well everyone went off, same thing the ball spun of the turf and bamboozled him he looked around at his stumps and his bat like it had a hole in it and walked off shaking his head.
The thought of a hat trick never even occurred to me. When the next guy came in he took his mark and came down and spoke to the other batsman and said to him, he is bowling off spin mate, nothing really its fruit. I thought well what can I bowl now. I had been practising my “wrong un ” and now was the time to try and bowl one.
I ran in and bowled a wrong un which is easy to pick if you are a off spinner, but he did not know where to put his feet and I caught him right in front for LBW, that was it hat trick at Mt Isa It felt so good, a hat trick to a cricketer whether school boys first grade or at the MCG is something you remember all your life.
We won that game easy I went on and got 7 for not bad. Getting clapped off again bought back memories of my school boy 100. It was a great season and I have never played competition again. I played social cricket for a while in Cairns. We used to go out to Fishery Falls and the rules were play 8 over’s on and then go off for a beer. Everyone used to like that.
What do you think about the Warnie stature. I asked? Well he said, I do hope that the pigeons stay away. Warnie deserves better than having pigeon crap over him, after all the mainstream press have crapped over him for years, and no doubt may have cost him the captaincy.
I watched it on TV. I thought Mark Taylor was great, and also entertaining. However that guy the president of the MCG, made a “smart ass” comment when he said that Liz Hurley, was now an honorary Australian because of her relationship with Warnie and that he was pleased that she did not come via Christmas island.
There is no need for a cheap shot at refugees, by the president of the MCG and shows there are still people in high places in our cricketing hierarchy that have an obvious leaning towards players with the right school tie.
It sends the wrong message to refugees, don’t play cricket, we don’t want your kind here. You won’t get selected or get into the hall of fame or have a stature in MCG park. Not for a couple of hundred years anyway and only after we have assimilated you, into the “aussie” mainstream and of course you must listen, to cricket on the ABC.
Well that’s Australia at that level, he said. I didn’t have to contend with that when I took my hat trick or made my hundred. That kid who led his team in clapping me in after I made my hundred, the principle from my school, and the skipper in Mt Isa, in a way, they helped shaped my outlook on how to p lay the game for the good reasons of sportsman ship, mateship and equality.
All would have been more gracious, than the president of the MCG, and that was in 1956!!. The MCG has been glacial in its move to the mainstream of Australia’s multi racial society.
Cricket Australia would surely been very disappointed in the shadenfredue remark, after all they have put a lot into grass roots cricket, in remote aboriginal communities and into competitions like the Imparja Cup in Central Australia.
Comments said in jest to get a laugh at someone elses expense, have been commonplace in Australias history. Laws are now in place to counter discrimination, but it appears that that there is still that underbelly of raceism in the Australian makeup that lingers on to this day.
The president should have stuck to the script. Sometimes it’s better to not open your mouth and be thought a fool, than to open it and leave no doubt.
Reports circulating in the mainstream media are targeting Aboriginal programs as inefficient and costly. So what is newsworthy about that? It’s not as if it’s a slow news cycle, given what else is happening in the world today.
The reporting should raise alarm bells among Indigenous organisations that depend on Government funding to service the need of Indigenous people. A Finance Department report prepared early last year revealed the Commonwealth is outlaying $3.5 billion each year on Aboriginal programs, which according to the report yield dismally poor results.
There is a “Business Model” used by Government, when Indigenous funding is under scrutiny, or indigenous organisations are for the chop. The pattern is subtle and orchestrated. First step, release the report to the mainstream press. In this instance, the Government’s Finance Department Report on Indigenous funding outlays.
The genie is then out of the bottle, newspapers report it, news radio reports it, shock jocks pick it up and with the help of some opposition members and selected Aboriginal talent set about demolishing the program. The “business model” is so refined and successful that people working in the area of Indigenous programs are helpless to do anything and are at the mercy of the press.
Part of the process is for the press to trot out a well known Aboriginal person to justify its attacks on Indigenous programs, this is called balanced reporting. It beggars belief how someone in the high level Aboriginal mainstream can accurately make a comment about a remote Aboriginal community. Simply because an Aboriginal person has achieved in the mainstream and has been educated with mainstream values, does not necessarily make that person qualified to comment on everything and anything to do with Aboriginal programs.
Before you know, discussion is rampant on the shock jock radio stations, the whole scene plays out, the Government gives the impression that it is acting in the best interest of Indigenous people, and takes action to cut programs. Mission accomplished. This business model is tried and true; for example look at how ATSIC was undermined, and there are others including the Aboriginal Legal Services.
A report by Amnesty International highlights the government’s intent to reduce funding to remote homeland. Funds that would normally go to the homelands being put into so called “Hub Towns”. This Hub Town business model sounds a lot like the South African model of the apartheid era; herd all the blackfellas into Hub Towns or “Townships” as the South Africans called them, and let them fight it out for services.
There are aspects of the model that, with dedicated people, could work, particularly in the areas of education and health. It is a lot easier to attract teachers and doctors to larger towns than to remote communities. But then there is the cultural aspect that must be considered. More than one-third of the NT’s Aboriginal population lives in 500 remote homeland communities.
Internationally acclaimed indigenous artist, Anmatyerr elder Kathleen Ngal, 78, said if Utopia residents are forced to move to “hub towns” they will become “third-class, non-existent human beings.” She said “My paintings are maps of our country … through my art I am educating the world about my country and my culture”. “I cannot paint when I’m not on my land.” She wants her grandchildren to have the opportunity to live on their country and to know their stories. “Country owns you or holds you, not you holding the country and becoming master of the land,” she said. The Federal and Territory governments are set to stop funding remote outstations when the Intervention ends next year, choosing instead to direct money to 21 of the biggest communities. The effect on aunties such as Kathleen Ngal will be devastating.
The recent productivity report into the future of health services for the ageing found that people like to stay in their homes and in surroundings that they are used to. A 82 year old lady told news 24 that she did not like the hostel that she was in. Not because of the staff simply because she wanted to be home on country. The commission has made recommendations that allow our old folks to live and die with dignity on their special piece of country. Their own homes.
Why can’t Kathleen Ngal and her countrymen stay on their country?
Why must they be herded like sheep into Townships of despair? Why?
A recent internet usage survey, by a Melbourne University in 3 Central Australian Aboriginal communities highlighted the size of the problem that National Broadband Network (NBN) has in providing high speed broadband services in remote Australia.
It comes as no surprise for the inhabitants in remote Australia, that communication services are one of many services that are lacking. Media services are well behind the other more important services of health, education, land, and housing.
This is regardless that media is considered an essential service and a right under United Nations Charters. Blind Freddie can tell you that, “we don’t need a University survey to tell us what we already know”. The work done by the university is commendable but will it make any difference to the situation. History tells us that service delivery in remote towns and communities in remote Australia takes on all the characteristics of a glacier.
There are large gaps in radio services in most remote communities and homelands, not just in remote Australia but Western NSW, and Northern Victoria. Radio services are a basic need, for remote people purely for emergency services.
The spending of millions on broadband is a “diversion from the real need”. The basic building block of communications in the bush is radio services; this has been largely ignored by governments for over 40 years service providers have been starved for funds over a long period.
A report titled “Out of the silent land” A Federal Government task force report by Eric Wilmot published in 1984 recommended that basic satellite receiving and re-transmission equipment be installed into remote Aboriginal and Torres Strait Island communities throughout Australia. The project came to be known as, Broadcasting Remote Aboriginal Communities Scheme, or BRACS
The “scheme” only a bureaucrat could dream up a title like with such a name as “scheme”. and it is reflected on the service and the complete lack of funds that went into it, ATSIC came along and called it a program and it has remained a program ever since, with no real commitment from government to take account of the recommendations or concerns of Aboriginal people, that the service was meant to connect.
Australia’s Indigenous peoples were concerned that the introduction of modern technology would spread western style monoculture, undermine traditional values, and have a detrimental effect in communities.
In order to combat a slow destruction of cultural tradition and values, communities requested resources to preserve, protect, and promote Indigenous languages and cultures by, broadcasting radio language programs locally and produce cultural video material of their own stories for replay and archiving.
Most communities that were rolled out have a low powered 10 watt FM service and if the wind is blowing the wrong way you won’t hear it, or if it is TV you won’t see it because of the distortion. All communities are reliant on satellite for most of their programming. They call it satellite dreaming out bush. Once you leave the community or small town, you enter the silent land again for some dependent where you are it could hundreds of Kilometres.
The answer for radio is to think seriously about Digital AM services which will give coverage to everyone. For TV the VAST satellite is a good option giving up to 17 free services to communities, after all you can’t watch TV in the car we have to wait a bit longer for that.
And now along comes NBN, they really don’t want to be there with the real deal of cable, they have come up with the alternate satellite and wireless combination. There is some merit in their plans, as it will give a useable service to isolated parents, station owners, and those aboriginal people who can afford the infrastructure and the cable bill every month and depending on the package it could be from $90 to $160.
Everyone and their dog in remote Australia are telling the Government that broadband satellite is not the answer. Satellite raises too many issues that remain unresolved. I was talking to an old mate who is a doctor, he worked out of the Territory for years, and he was so frustrated by the problems with video conferencing over satellite that he stopped using it, reverting back to phone and fax.
If someone comes along and solves Einstein’s theories and can deliver a signal faster than the speed of light then we will always have the problem of latency. Latency is when you are waiting for the pictures and the voice to catch up. We have all seen it as it is being used more and more by media broadcasters using a range of satellite services like skype, you quickly flick to another channel, when you are faced with it.
This debate has a long way to go. If it was anything like the Wilmot Report that brought some services to remote communities, then the change will take another 50 years or longer.
If communities want fast broadband services and not have to deal with satellite or wireless they will have to take it on themselves. In many parts of the country fibre optic cable has been laid by Telstra. The recent deal to use that infrastructure has opened up prospects for remote communities to roll out their own networks as an enterprise and create some employment.
If the cable runs past the community like it does in quite a lot of communities then the opportunity arises for the community to install infrastructure communities themselves and create a good business enterprise.
Now that is a good project for a university, go to it guys and help us find the community and do a business model,
I ran into and old mate when I was in Victoria recently. He had just come back from his home town of Towong up on the Murray River a little town nestled in the cradle of the Snowy Mountains, where you can still find Murray Trout and Murray Cray’s.
As long as I have known him he was always known as” old Tommy”.
He has done most things he grew up in the high country he was in the war, he trained race horses he won races all over the country and even won at Flemington. He was as hard and tough as a red gum strainer post. He took no crap from any man he could hold his own with the best of them, and in a fight he would throw them long and straight his reputation had followed him all his life.
He told me, how he was adopted from the home in Melbourne as a young boy and taken up to the high country, his adopted family were church going people from the land and they wanted to give a kid a chance, they picked me because I was a big strong lad he told me.
Years later when, the Aboriginal link up services began one day he got a letter in the mail from a brother who had tracked him down through the home. It was only in the 1980’ that he found that he had extended Aboriginal family of 2 brothers and a sister.
He said to me years before, I always knew he said; there is something in you, that connects you with country. I never got lost when I was a boy in the high country; I was never frightened when the dogs would howl at night on those cold nights. I always had a sense that something or someone was always watching over me.
When we were in the home they told us all that we were orphans, there were other kids like me there white kids and black kids we all bonded as boys, that’s all we had. When they came and took me up to the high country, life for me changed forever, I learned to ride and muster and sheer sheep, and shoe horses.
They were good to me on the farm; I joined the army and loved it. They taught me about life there. I loved the marching loved the friendship. It was sad when I left the army but something else was calling me. I went sheering for years saved my money and bought a little place and raised our boys, and got into horse training.
The fact that I am Aboriginal and my boys are Aboriginal and they all have kids, has made no difference to how we are today, I guess that is assimilation, he said I have listened to you talk about that and now I understand what you are saying, but there is no way back for me and my family mate, except to take the cards dealt, take life as it has been handed to us and build for our grand kids.
I recalled how he took a couple of horses up for the carnival at Towong, it’s the dream of any trainer to win the cup from your home town and Tommy had the horse to do it.
We sat up at night and old Tommy yarned away about his early life as an adopted lad and worked for good people who took good care of him during times when kids were used as farm help. We looked across towards Kosciuszko and he pointed out a saddle in the mountains and said.
I used to have to go up there and muster the cattle down over that saddle down to the yards here when I was a boy. There was a bit of the man from Snowy River in him as he spoke like Clancy of his deeds as a young man on the overflow. There was no talk of wild rides just old Tommy reminiscing, about his life as a boy in the saddle with his horse his swag and his dog. I used to bring them down in small mobs of 20 or so and then go back again. It was easy he said, just point them towards home and they would find their own way.
The big day came, and Tommy’s horse in the cup was favourite it had won in town so the form was good and the horse dually greeted the judge first by about 6 lengths, his good mare also won the bracelet race that day. It had been the day of dreams for Tommy and he was so happy that he could go back home and win his home town cup.
When I saw him this time a tear came to my eye because this man who stood 6’ 4’’ was a shadow of his former self he stooped and limped toward me his back done in by years of sheering and an accident breaking in a young horse. With outstretched hand he looked up from under his hat and said to me, hello old mate “someone told me you were dead”.
I said you look well yourself old mate, you have been in a good paddock yeah he said I am 92 this year. I just got back from the old place had to go home one more time and see “god’s country he said again and again.
That country is sacred to me, many a day and night I was guided by the Crow, the Eagle, and the old Bat. Never got lost, he said never got lost.
Let’s have a beer for old times’ sake old mate, I think I can still knock a couple of pots back. Old mate may also tip me a winner.
Laura is in Quinkin Country, well known for the rock art and the bi annual Laura Aboriginal Dance festival.
Aboriginal tribes come from all over Cape York came to Quinkin country to pay their respect to the traditional owners of the rock art sacred sites and to dance at the sacred Bora ring like their ancestors have done for over 40,000 years.
The 500 dancers from 20 tribes kicked up a lot of dust, made a lot of noise, ate a lot of tucker and kept the crowd of 5,000 spell bound and asking for more.
Old mate Unc, went back to Quinkin country to listen to his grandfathers stories from elder and traditional owner Tommy George.
Unc’s pick of the dancers were the Lockhart River, and the Injinoo tribes.
But after 250 dancers and lots of clap sticks and didge, old unc had seen enough. Leaving the dance areas Unc ran into an old mate recently elected Co Chair of the national congress, Les Malezar. Lez was visiting and touting for business for members of the new congress. He made his way to the Radio Laura tent for an interview. Asked on radio what issues the congress was looking to engage with, he drew attention to the 4th anniversary of the Northern Territory Emergency Response, commonly known as the Intervention.
He pointed out that for a supposed emergency, measures put in place 4 years ago are still there and are becoming a normal way of life. He also highlighted how the intervention had stigmatised Aboriginal people.
Ex ATSIC Commissioner for Tasmania, Rodney Dillon was also there, getting people interested in and talking up the declaration on the rights of Indigenous people. You may remember that after the Howard Government refused to ratify the declaration, along came Kevin Rudd, and ratified it and also made the apology to the stolen generations.
If you are thinking about coming for the next Laura Festival, be prepared to rough it, I mean there is new meaning to the word thunder boxes. Those ones on the movie “Kenny” were thrones in comparison “Just picture a long drop into a wheelie bin and you will be there”
Apart from the blackfellas, Laura festival seems to be a magnet for hippies young and old and grey nomads. Which sets up an interesting dynamic between those that want a good nights sleep and those that like to sit up and play tom toms.
If you are ok with someone camping within one metre of you, then you will have a great time in Quinkin country.
The pastoral industry are using whatever means they can to get support for a resumption of live cattle exports to Indonesia.
They are very quick to use the Aboriginal controlled stations to support their cause when it suits them. It was not very long ago that the pastoral industry was fighting and is still fighting every Aboriginal land claim that hits the table.
What hypocrisy. Remember the outcry from the industry over Mabo?. Remember the Wik Native Title debates? Remember the walk off from Wave Hill?
The industry has to come from a long way back, after over 200 years, before the pastoralists can even begin to make up for the dispossession, exploitation and theft of land.
Just like old soldiers, who suffered atrocities of the Japanese in world war 2, Aboriginal people will never forget what has happened to them as a result of the push by pastoralists into their country and the atrocities that impact on them today.
Nothing short of a truth and reconciliation inquiry into the pastoral industry in Northern Australia will suffice. This has to happen before the “cattle industry” can even think about speaking on behalf of the Aboriginal Pastoral Industry.
The Human Rights Commissioner Tom Calma made some typical Aboriginal middle class comments regarding the Aboriginal cattle stations and the suspension of live exports. He needs a shot of reality, as we have become used to the comments from him and this band of elite Aborigines within our midst orchestrating all Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples towards assimilation.
There have been advances in the industry as Aboriginal stations come on line, some employment has been created and a small number of Aboriginal people enjoy their Native Title, but remember folks it’s not Land Rights and it has divided Australia’s Aboriginal peoples.
I was watching the ABC Drum programme, and a story buried in between the carbon debate, Afghanistan, Libya, and Syria, caught my attention. It was the Julia Gillard visit to Alice Springs and it opened up the the debate again on housing.
The debate has been raging in one form or another for 40 years or more. What to do about the shortage of housing, and how to build affordable solid housing, to withstand the elements of Central and Northern Australian remote areas.
It is clear, that the housing companies, the bureaucrats and ad hoc Aboriginal building teams are not delivering, simply because of the archaic current construction and delivery methods that have been in place in Territory housing for decades.
What pricked my interest were the comments made by Fran Kelly on the Drum. Fran is the only person in all the years the debate has been going on who has made any sense or offered a solution.
No one on the panel reacted to what she said, It went straight over their heads and little wonder because they are not involved in the construction industry and would not be able to drive a nail or use a screwdriver.
What she said was, that she could not understand why the government doesn’t build houses somewhere and ship them out already built.
Ummmmm they said and moved on to the next item. I know that there has been various attempts, to construct donga type housing in an ad hoc way. If I understood what Fran was saying or thinking, there needs to be a much better engeneering proposition out there for Aboriginal housing. We hear horror stories on a daily basis about the shoddy workmanship, incomplete jobs, and inadequate septic systems.
What is needed is a government funded “roll on roll off” factory to be built in the Territory. Ideally Alice Springs could be the central place with components being manufactured in Darwin, Tennant Creek, and South Australia. The Victorian housing commission, had such a factory at Homesglen many years ago and they turned out great houses in concrete panels design. They built thousands of houses in places like Bendigo and Ballarat in a very short time.
A factory in the NT, using modern technology and construction methods, would meet the future needs of housing in Northern Territory, the Kimberley and Western Queensland. The construction and erection time could be cut significantly.
The transport infrastructure is already in place now with the Ghan, able to transport the materials at reasonable cost, either out of Darwin using the trading partners in Asia, or the Australian manufacturing sector in Southern Australia.
Mobile batching plants can also be set up to construct the floor slabs in communities, teams would build the slabs, and move on then construction teams would follow and erect the homes that would be complete with all of the fittings.
The factory could build enough housing for the Aboriginal communities, the town camps, and also for the town folks themselves. As everyone knows, the costs of building a house in the Territory are enormous in comparison to the other states.
Supplying houses in the future for the mainstream market would ensure that affordable housing was also maintained for Territorians.
If these houses could be built in an undercover factory with overhead cranes, modern factory environment and using modern equipment, it would go a long way to solving the long term housing problem in the Territory.
The government, would be investing in the long term future of the Territory, When the construction of Aboriginal housing was complete the enterprise could be handed over to a consortium of businesses in Alice to continue making houses for the general economy.
That is what I think Fran was meaning, but it went straight over everyone’s head.
The whole master chef series is an orchestrated affair. Why? Well cast your mind back to the previous nights changing of the baskets. It took place with all the drama of a primary school plot.
When Jay was given the basket and expected to make cherios the net was cast . He would have been better to make jonnie cakes and serve it with jam. Jonnie cakes you ask, what are they? Well they are traditionally cooked in the coals of a camp fire, eaten with jam or syrup, I prefer them cooked on the top of an old wood stove.
Poor Jay, he was set up from the start, they knew he had little experience in some areas, so the scene was set by the show’s producers and orchestrated so that he faced elimination. It’s got nothing to do with cooking, that’s a side show. It’s about ratings and acting like shock jocks. Jay was forced into elimination with the two girls and after making Ellie cry and making stupid sexist comments about lipstick (look at Nigella) the night before. The judges were then obliged to leave the two girls in. I mean anyone could see the play, it stuck out like dogs balls guys.
Jay was humiliated by you guys, absolutely humiliated, we know it was a pay back because he was a car salesman, you guys are unbelievable, you showed all the panache of a couple of shearers cooks. Actually shearers cooks have more dignity and are real men and women.
As for the dish idea, it is something you would encounter at the sushi train. I mean who cooks a pandan chiffon cake with palm sugar and black sesame ice cream?
Let’s put that Asian cook up against the Iron Chef and see how he would fare with a real Asian dish, not just that wok stir fry that they do in the restaurant where he spends his time making his pandan chiffon cake and black sesame ice cream. As for the dish, don’t try and buy tapioca. I tried at my local coles store, they never heard of it.
I guess the shearers cooks will find some way to eliminate Kumar. They have tried but he has outsmarted them. Gotta keep the girls on don’t we boys. Whose turn tonight to be humiliated? I couldn’t care less I won’t be watching, I will be out at the sushi train trying some of that pandan chiffon packet cake.
The rush by mining companies to stitch up the resources on Aboriginal land, is gaining momentum and is all part of their business model to exploit the riches of this country, pay as little in compensation and taxes, leave the country like a moonscape and at the same time send a message to the public, that they are good corporate citizens.
At the recent mining industry dinner at Parliament House, we were shown the spectacle of a gloating Chairman of Rio presenting a patronising and condescending speech where he spoke at length of the great relationship Rio had built up with the Aboriginal community.
“Well he would say that wouldn’t he” the mining industry could well afford to gloat. After winning the battle on Native Title, with the help of the Howard Government and a select group of Jacky Jacky Aboriginal people, who sold out hard fought for principles of the Aboriginal movement, to appease the government and the miners, so the exploitation of resources could carry on relentlessly.
In a pan across the dinner tables there was not one black fella. I did not see anyone from a remote community there sitting in their suits and ties if they were there, they would have been down the back, and it is very unlikely that Kangaroo, Crocodile, or Emu was on the menu.
Broadcasting the speech live by the ABC news 24 was shameful, and a low point for the ABC, what enlightened neanderthal producer on News 24 decides to make ABC News 24 an advertiser for the mining industry. If the ABC wants to go into advertising then let’s just sell them off.
Sitting there in my lounge room watching it, turned my stomach. I thought of all the Aboriginal people, who had fought long and hard all of their lives, for land rights and human rights. From the tent embassy days, right back to the massacres at Waterloo Creek and I thought, you guys just dont get it do you.
What a cheek, with the plight of Aboriginal people, the mining and business establishment enjoying a lavish dinner, gloating and patting themselves on the back, over the theft of resources from Aboriginal land. The industry are in effect sending the same message as Marie Antoinette “let them eat cake”. The ABC News 24 has opened up a pandoras box and are acting more like shock jock radio and tabloid newspapers. It puts a new meaning to the slogan our “Our ABC” what a joke . Can I now expect news 24 to cross in prime time to the Pan National Aboriginal Congress conference dinner.
The mining industry, would like the shareholders and the rest of the population to think, that they are doing the right thing by engaging and doing deals with specific groups of Native Title claimants. They throw money around like a drunken sailor to specific Native Title Claimants and clan groups, while others outside the claims, languish landless in the creek beds and rubbish dumps on the edges of town.
This is because, under the Native Title law as it now stands, Aboriginal people are prevented from sharing in claims by the Native Title rule, of having to prove continuous connection to land.
There is a two speed economy, also among Aboriginal people running alongside the mainstream economy the “Native Title Two Speed Economy” created largely by the mining companies exploitation of Native Title. They are only required to deal with people, where the mine lease is located. If an Aboriginal clan group is off the lease claim, by a boundary defined by an anthropologist, as a tree or a hill, they are not eligible; even though they may be part of the bigger language group of traditional owners, they receive nothing.
Native Title representative groups, have also exploited the act and have largely caused the “Native Title Two Speed economy”, building exclusive oligarchies and dynasties like the ones that operates in Central and Northern Australia. By bending the rules of continuous connection to land, they can exclude people that they don’t want. (sorry bruz your family not part of the claim) Members themselves in most Native Title groups, may not be able to prove continuous occupation to country. They may come from another area 200 kilometers away, but by some manipulation of connection by family line, are on the claim or part of the Native Title oligarchy.
As Keating says the act is onerous. Because if you put other historic peoples on to the claim, it diminishes the funds. So it is in the interest of the Native Title groups to practise exclusion on their own relations.
One of these Native Title Groups, in Central Australia sells grog, from a supermarket enterprise they have established in several locations. Aboriginal people now have a one stop shop to buy groceries and grog. The question needs to be asked of them.
Why are you selling grog, from a business built up out of Native Title funds?. Should the fund be used to benefit Aboriginal people in Central Australia and not just a few beneficiaries, riding roughshod over Aboriginal people who drift into town, selling them grog and acting like lords of the soil, while their people go hungry.
Rio and the other miners can afford to gloat and patronise Aboriginal people, hoping to put their previous racist campaigns and activities of the past aside, hoping that a fist full of dollars, would encourage people to forget the past. They expect Aboriginal people to forget their fierce anti Native Title campaign. Who can forget that racist campaign?
Who can forget that the leading spokespeople for continuing dispossession have been pillars of the business and mining community like Sir Arvi Parbo, Hugh Morgan and Henry Bosch.
Who can forget the racist fear campaign the Myths that went far beyond common decency?
- · The Mabo decision means my backyard isn’t safe from an Aboriginal land claim.
- · The Mabo decision allows Aboriginal people to gain ownership of Australia’s farming and grazing land.
- · Mabo will mean huge compensation payouts to Aboriginal people for the historical dispossession of all Aboriginal people from their land.
- · The Mabo decision means that Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people will “lock up” Australia’s mineral wealth causing disaster for the economy. This is confirmed by government moves to confirm mining leases at McArthur River and elsewhere.
Remember, Hugh Morgan, who, as a senior executive of mining company WMC, savaged Aboriginal spirituality in the 1980s and in the 1990s claimed that Native Title threatened Australia’s very sovereignty
Remember, Rob Davies, a mining analyst from Lehman Brothers International, speaking at a London financiers’ conference attacked the Mabo decision in this way: “If this decision stands, Australia could go back to being a Stone Age culture of 200,000 people living on witchetty grubs”
The Native Title deal unveiled this week by Rio Tinto, falls a long way short of what Aboriginal people will receive, from the wealth generated by Rio from the mineral on their land, it has been touted as the best thing since the “coming of the light”.
Any deal short of the Aboriginal people, being genuine share holder partners is no deal. Rio knows time is running out. The Aboriginal people disenfranchised now under the Native Title act, having to prove connection to country, is now under serious challenge.
Paul Keating said at his Redfern speech on the 10th of December 1992 that the problem starts with non-Aboriginal Australians. We did the dispossessing. We took the traditional lands and smashed the traditional way of life. We brought the disasters. The alcohol. We committed the murders. We took the children from their mothers. We practiced discrimination and exclusion.
Now the mining industry expects us to move on from our history. It is like asking all Australians to forget the atrocities of the Japanese on the Burma Road? How do we forget the atrocities of the concentration camps? the Court in the Haig hasn’t forgotten Bosnia.
Former Prime Minister Keating introduced the Native Title Act almost two decades ago, but the act has undergone amendments since then. Recently he said the requirement to prove a continuous connection to land is too onerous. The Howard Government’s 1998 amendments to the act diminish its value, he says. Central to his concerns was the legal requirement for Aboriginal people to prove a continuous connection to their country.
“This onerous burden of proof has placed an unjust burden on those native title claimants who have suffered the most severe dispossession and social disruption,” he said.
As novelist Xavier Herbert said in his book Poor Fellow My Country:
“Until we give back to the black man just a bit of the land which was his, and give it back without provisos … we shall remain what we have always been so far: a people without integrity, not a nation but a community of thieves.”
What Noel Pearson says in his weekend Australian article of May 28 that choice is power for development and progress and ultimately creates social change in individuals and families.
What he says makes a lot of sense to me. Mind you there is not much about the mechanisations of Noel Pearson that I agree with.
Linking choice to good health, education, social infrastructure and economic freedoms is a principle that I have believed in all of my working life.
Choice and the principles of user choice, goes to the heart of Indigenous development and is at the centre of a larger debate going on among Aboriginal learning centres, Aboriginal RTO training providers, and indigenous individuals, particularly the young emerging indigenous diaspora, than want a better life, and to be able to choose for themselves and take on the responsibilities and discipline of the choices they make.
Choice or more commonly known these days as user choice,; it’s not a principle that came to me as I was laying back in my swag , looking into the night sky and suddenly seeing a star falling in the east.
It came to me in a more realistic and tangible way. I recall when I was growing up, when we kids got sick, or mum got sick, we had to go to the doctor in town based at the hospital. I recall walking through the bush down a sandy road about 2 kilometres to the bus stop and catching the early morning bus.
The bus would take us to close to the hospital where we would walk a few blocks. The hospital used to open at 9am in those days and close at 5pm. I always remember my poor mum being one of the first there when the doors opened and sitting there in outpatients all day. All of the Aboriginal and Islander people were made to wait and gave up their turn in the queue to the white folk.
Mum and the other ladies just endured this practice in silence. The nurse would come out and look around and if there was a white person there, call their name. This would go on all day; it did not matter that she had registered at 9am, she would sit all day with patience and dignity, waiting her turn. Sometimes we missed the bus, and we would have to walk the 8 or more kilometres home and we would arrive home just on dark.
When private health insurance came in, mum joined the family up and for the first time in her life she had a choice, to use whatever doctor she wanted for her family. She was so pleased and happy and stayed in health insurance all her life, just so she had the doctor of her choice.
I always remember that and the principle of choice has stayed with me ever since. Choice for her and many other Aboriginal people in those days meant a better and a healthy life style. I am not in hospital benefits now, only because we have a great Aboriginal health service and the blatant racism does not exist to the same extent of those bygone days. In those days, we always sat at the back of the bus even though there was no written law. Aboriginal people were conditioned to move to the back of the bus.
My mum exercised what Pearson writes about, she exercised her individual right to self determination, personal empowerment, her self-actualisation of having control over her life and taking responsibility for herself and her family.
The discipline and responsibility of choice in my mum’s case, was to make sure she kept up her health payment. She maintained her payments even in her pension years; she stayed with a plan, a discipline she maintained for 40 years. Thinking back she would have been in the vanguard of Aboriginal people, using choice in joining a health medical benefits plan.
In today’s climate Aboriginal students and participants in education, there is a shift to user choice, for example kids can practically choose what university they go too, what training establishment they prefer. Students and program participants can now look at a school, university, RTO, look at the services they provide and then make an informed choice on where they want to go.
Most mainstream training organisations, RTO’s and the like, have taken a lot of time to set up proper and consistent protocols, to embrace indigenous culture and are mindful of the requirements in education practises that fit in with the training needs of Indigenous people.
The job scene is also changing rapidly. One time the only job was as a stockman on the station, now after long periods of idleness and lost generations, people can now choose what training they want, where they want to train, and what job outcome can come from that training.
Choice changed my mother’s life all those years ago and choice has already changed the life style of many Aboriginal people. Having choice does empower people giving them the capabilities and the opportunity for a better outcome in life.
My view is that wherever you are, always choose user choice whenever the opportunity arises.
The recent visit by the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Navi Pillay, laid it on the line when she said that the Northern Territory Intervention needed a rethink. That it was fundamentally wrong and that the intervention had caused deep hurt and pain to Aborigines.
Of the people she met , “One person told me that he didn’t have money left to buy ice-cream for his children,” she said. “The whole voluntariness of spending your own income has been removed from them. They feel they are being targeted.”
The concern is whether there anyone listening to what the commissioner had to say. The media have trotted out the usual people and agencies for comment on what she had said. We have heard it all before. It is obvious that interest has dropped off; no one is listening, and no one cares. The footy season is nigh. The news media are just going through the motions and are becoming increasingly frustrated from the orchestrated responses from pollies.
The good old Greens keep punching away; on both of the issues, the Territory Intervention, and refugees. Good on them for that, but my sensors tell me that people are a little bit sick of seeing Sarah Hanson Young on their screens.
The talk back mob struggled as well, as their audience load the Winnebago’s up and follow each other around the country tail to tail in their own form of “caterpillar dreaming”. Their interest is to avoid paying camping fees. They are running out of things to say and are getting as old and tired as some of the presenters.
Fairfax has seen the light and is selling their flagship talk back radio stations and The Australian is hoping for another tweet from Larrisa to get its ratings up, or another Town Camp story with pictures.
Even good old “auntie” with it boring repetitive news 24 and their whole ensemble of tax payer funded digital frequencies, and web portal have struggled to grab the attention of the average punter. Even though the ABC has given new meaning to the word podcasting, they have not laid a glove or had an impact.
This of course is timely for government. No one has really reacted about the refugees since the Malaysian solution was announced, except the libs carping on about about caning. No caning on Naru they say, “touche”. The steam has been taken out of the debate and the average punter can sleep peaceably in their beds at night, because the politicians and government bureaucrats will have done the dirty deeds for them on refugees and the intervention, on their behalf.
The message here is that it is not the Ice Cream that’s the issue, it is the disempowerment and shame of not being able to provide for the family unit. The very thing Australia built its reputation on as a fair and equitable civil society. However “the Aboriginal family unit”, has been raped and pillaged by the last Liberal government, now its Labour turning the screws even harder and maintaining the intervention with all of its failings. “That’s why, that poor bugger can’t buy his kids an ice cream”.
I spoke to an “old Unc” about this and other comments that had been made by the commissioner when I saw him down the street. I remember when I was a kid on the station, he said, we never had ice cream, and actually we never had much at all.
My dad worked like a donkey on the station for “ little bit flour and little bit tea”. He wanted a better life for us so we moved down to town before the war. There were a lot of people on the move. We camped out near the mangroves, actually it was in the mangroves, the mosquitoes and sand flies drove us mad but we got used them. I remember mum took us to town and bought us ice cream; she would have a pot of tea and a ham sandwich. It was great they used to scoop the ice cream out of big long cans.
There were only 2 colours. We used to get the white one because we did not like the black one (chocolate). Looking back the shop owner always wanted to give us the black one. Wonder why?, he asked. I don’t know I said, maybe deep down he thought that black kids liked chocolate ice cream.
We both laughed, it’s good to laugh at things like that. I remember a time the great depression, they call it. My father would come home from looking for work. Sometimes he would get a job for the day down at the waterfront loading raw sugar.
He would come home, the molasses from the brown sugar would be dripping down his back, he would wear a piece of hessian bag with a hole cut in and slip it over his head to soak up the molasses, all the wharfies used them. It never stopped the molasses from dripping all over his back.
He would slump into an old canvass chair, like the ones in the old picture theatres and have a homemade mango wine; he could not afford anything else.
One day he came home there was no work and he said “kids I won’t be able to buy you and ice-cream this week”. Maybe if they pick me for work next week it will be ok. There are a lot of men looking for work down there. I don’t like my chances, there are a lot of big TI fellas down there looking for work and they pick them first he said, because they are big and strong.
There were a lot of kids whose parents could not afford ice cream, it wasn’t the end of the world. They had other things on their minds, and there was no human rights commissioner to bring the situation to the world. I left him there playing his ukelale out front of the market, people walking buy throwing a few coins into his hat.
The reporting of the Intervention by a section of the media has been tendentious from the very beginning, supporting the governments and a few selected Aboriginal people’s views. It was always destined to fail. The people on the ground told us that.
This latest report from the UN Commissioner does us no good. It is difficult now because the Howard/Brough plan polarised the country on blackfellas and refugees. We are dealing with a pernicious and hostile press who have dug a hole for themselves in supporting the view of Howards lifted One Nation policies. The current government are locked in now, fearing that any change will diminish their chances of re-election.
What has happened to us a nation, we don’t deserve this. The Human Rights Commissioner Ms Pillay has hit a nerve, practically calling the country racist. Our current media oligarchy is undecided on how to challenge her, some preferring to ignore her, happy to see the back of her.
That countryman out in Alice who can’t afford an ice cream for his kids is an unfortunate sign of the times for a lot of ordinary Australians. The country is becomeing poorer, jobs are going off shore, “Julia, Julia, Julia” what else can go wrong.
Senator Fielding in his rejection of his support of the Tony Abbott, Wild Rivers private members bill, was letting his conscience guide him. Fielding is a Christian and attends CityLife Church a large Pentecostal church in Melbourne. On the ABC television program Q&A he admitted to being a creationist but would not answer whether or not he believes that the Earth is less than 10,000 years old.
The party that Fielding represents was founded in South Australia in time to contest the 2002 state elections, when former Assemblies of God pastor Dr Andrew Evans became its first Member of the Legislative Council (MLC), winning a seat in the South Australian Legislative Council.
Then along came fielding in 2004 winning just 1.9% of the vote to represent Victorian in the senate, well Victorians had enough of him and in 2010 fired him.
With the Family First philosophy built firmly in his mind, his attitude towards Aboriginal people was always going to determine, that Aboriginal people were better off under a system, where their lives are orchestrated towards welfare and assimilation.
The Family First party has no tangible Aboriginal policy that gives hope to Aboriginal people. They have no firm policy on self determination, economic development, and land ownership. Their attempts at winning over Aboriginal voters and middle Australia were seen as being sinister with the nomination of an Aboriginal woman, lawyer Andrea Mason, as party President.
There was no way Fielding was ever going to support Wild Rivers. He was always angling for a deal from the State and the Feds, that’s the nature of independents. Fielding played the “black card” and simply out played them.
I can’t believe the naivety of Noel Pearson and others in his camp to think that Fielding would support Wild Rivers.
Family First’s preferencing agreement with the Coalition in the 2004 federal election led Barnaby Joyce to publicly slam the party the day before the election, calling them “the lunatic Right”, and stating that “these are not the sort of people you do preference deals with”. Joyce said that in 2004, what has changed in 2011, why would you believe that Fielding would support you, why?
Look at his record on the Paid Parental Leave Scheme, Fielding suggested “some women may rort the scheme by deliberately falling pregnant and then having a late-term abortion”. He was subsequently criticised by all sides of Australian politics for these comments
He opposed the Rudd Government’s alcopops tax. He argued that taxing ready to drink alcohol beverages wouldn’t put an end to binge drinking. Since then the Senator has campaigned hard for the government to act on Australia’s binge drinking culture.
In February 2009, he told a Senate hearing that he believed divorce added to the impact of global warming because it resulted in people switching to a “resource-inefficient lifestyle”.I mean “Hello”
What hope Aboriginal peoples in the Cape that want to improve their lifestyle, when they are up against a modern day zealot and a devotee of the Family First doctrine.
Wild Rivers is flawed, we know why the Beattie Government done the deal politically, with the greens to enable labor to cling to power. This legislation, guarantees the two speed economy of Aboriginal people in the Cape, is maintained for the resource rich Aboriginal folk now getting some benefits, from mining in their regions.
For the remainder of Aboriginal people who have no mineral resources, just their land the right to earn from it is diminished. They have been condemned to a life of poverty, misery and despair.
The circumstances in today’s economy have changed, with governments tightening the screws and running a welfare reform agenda, the need to open up development to Aboriginal people is now stronger than ever.
In this so called 2 stage or patchwork economies where do Aboriginal people with little or no resources of mining agriculture, tourism, fishing or pastoral industries fit. How do you measure someone on a basic card?. How do you even begin to build the communities into economic hubs, if you don’t support their aspirations to get off welfare?
This whole business of Wild Rivers legislation is stopping development in the Cape and for Aboriginal people from having economies, and keeping them reliant on government handouts.
Calling Fielding a judas and a miserable man is probably close to the mark, but to Fielding it is water off a ducks back, he will slink back to his Christian roots, and the greens will forever be in his debt.
Calling Fielding a “Judas” and a miserable man is probably close to the mark, but to Fielding it is like
The Australian Newspaper, who everyone knows is running to a set agenda. It now deludes itself in an article “one hand tweeting” that the Australian Newspaper alone, is the leader of the “fourth estate” and is winning the contest of ideas as its articles deliver the accountability and transparency that underpins our democracy. I would like a dollar for every time a mainstream journalist in search of a self rightious hit, has pulled that old chestnut out of the fire.
The time spent by journalism students being preached a doctrine which surfaced in the British Parlament in 1787, and one year after the first boat people landed in Sydney Cove, is testament as to why we have so many sub standard newspaper journalists today.
Much better to have studied a unit on Aboriginal Australia, and then the journalists writing the Aboriginal stories, would have a better idea of the background to the situation Aboriginal people find themselves in today.
In Australia today a large number of Aboriginal people remain landless and ethnics in their own land. There are a lot of Aboriginal people in Victoria and NSW not signing off on a multi million dollar gas deal, their land has been stolen from under them, beginning on on that faithful day 1n 1788 when they sailed down Sydney Cove.
It is not just a couple of Aboriginal women in Central Australia who suffer from delusions of grandeur. Some Australian newspaper journalists suffer the same symtoms, are quick to claim that they are on the side of good and that others that don’t agree are on the side of evil. “Your with us or against us”.
The battle with Fairfax, is as ferioucious and penecious, as their reporting of black issues, the only difference is that it is not on the front page.
Depending on your view of the Australian newspaper, many ordinary punters would find their putting down of people with opposing views not in the best interests of community decency and democracy. The Australian’s view is self-serving. They ignore the key principles of balanced reporting. They are short on substance and the checks and balances required in a modern democracy.
The term “fourth estate” is loosely used term by journalists to putdown others, when they are seeking the moral high ground on articles that are with odds to their own sub standard content .
In this case the Australian is putting down the Fairfax news for not getting into the gutter and reporting issues like the Berehet – Price affair, in the same way as their journalists drag black Australia through the mud, putting one Aboriginal against another, in order to get a story. Claiming that that such stories are in the community interest. No one gives a toss as to what Berehert said, no one that is except those Aboriginal people who have an axe to grind.
Last weekend, a story appeared in the Fairfax press sparked by the Australian’s front page reporting of a tweet in which Behrendt engaged in what amounted to a bit of “bar talk”. Behrendt tweeted about a substandard monosybilic performance by Price on ABC Q&A.
What is wrong with that? its a simple bit of Australian larrakinism. You can hear the same talk on TV she did not use the bad language which is so common these days on TV, and in any bar or club in Australia. Maybe because it was a woman and a black one that said, it is the reason the moral fourth estate Australian newspaper was so quick to moralise about its role and its ability to deliver the accountability and transparency that underpins our democracy. and pours scorn on rivals or individuals that don’t agree with its opinions.
Their view is inconsistent and not in keeping with principles of good journalism, their thinking is straight out of the political ideology in Mein Kampf
The Australian says that the Herald self – censored the original Behrendt – Price story. Maybe it was because it was not newsworthy or suitable reading for the readers of a quality newspapers published by the Hearald. Better to let the fading Australian newspaper run another beat up sterio type story on the front page about Aboriginal people.
This strange approach matters little to us as it serves only to highlight the benefits our readers enjoy. But it hardly seems fair to Herald readers or the broader public, who might be interested in this crucial discussion.
The issue is not as the Australian says about who speaks for Central Australian Aboriginal people, they are well supported by a cultural structure and an organisational structure. No Indivedual blackfella speaks for the whole mob. The two women provideing all of the copy are part of the problem of the intervention. They delude themselves that they speak for the mob. It is a common thing among most Aboriginal people that when someone bestows the title “:leader” it goes to their head, they think they are untouchable, and can say and do as they like, ignoring the rules of common decency and respect.
The situation with the intervention is that it was and is built on naked racism. It is underpinned by the so called “fourth estate” remember them? they deliver the accountability and transparency that underpins our democracy. That what the Australian tells us. You cant have your cake and eat it too, Racism is racism does not matter how you dress it up.
Any one indivedual who supports the intervention, any newspapers and radio commentator who supports the intervention also supports racism and discrimination of Aboriginal people.
Ethical standards in reporting by mainstream media coupled with a thirst for cash from shareholders, is having an impact on the public who read newspapers. They have been disillusioned for a long time. So much for the dream of the 1789 doctrine of a Fourth Estate. It belongs in the waste paper basket of time.
As the sun sinks over “Dog Dreaming” In Alice
All the cracks are gathering for the fray
The noted interventionists from communities near and far.
Are mustering at the Alice overnight
For the interventionist love discrimination where the Aboriginal people are
And the “Australian newspaper” and the ABC snuff the battle with delight
There was Tony who made his name when Turnbull and Nelson bit the dust.
Few can ride beside him when his belligerence is up.
He will go to town camps, where even Julia or Macklin wouldn’t go.
And the good old boys and girls from Alice were there to lend a hand,
There was Woolworths, Coles, Ahorua, and even a Native Title Group.
No better grog baron can pour a better beer.
No journalist can throw him, when he is on song
He learnt to ride with Noel when teaching in the Cape.
And down by Canberra , where the politicians meet
Where the air is clear and the winter nights are long
The treasurer rises for the battle, and grabs the reins with glee
And down around the town camps where dust and flies prevail
The man from Canberra will be forgotten
And the town folk camped on sacred ground
Will tell the story of his ride.
Call a spade a spade, whatever way you look at it, the intervention by Howard and Brough was a racist act. Those that support the intervention are supporting discrimination, and the debate has become personal.
The Australian is leading the way with consistent attacks on the people who are opposed to the intervention. The Australian is using its stable of “Aboriginal Leaders” to convince a wider audience that selected racism is ok as long as it is against Aborigines.
Those journalists, working for The Australian newspaper must know deep down that what they are doing is against all common journalistic decency. First and foremost the Australian public expect better from you as journalists. To put a highly educated black woman up against a traditional woman with a limited grasp of the English language and the comprehension of the simplest construction of words, is a sign of a decaying and morally bankrupt newspaper.
The community person is always going to win the popularity stakes simply because the readers of the Australian believe that the community person is the real Aboriginal, and the other person is the smart arse academic.
Labor, in not rolling back the intervention, failed its own social conscious test shamefully; the “light on the hill” is no longer a battle cry for the poor and downtrodden that Labor once stood for. The Labor party has moved so far from its principles, that they are in competition with the opposition in a race to see to see which party can be the biggest bastards to Aboriginal peoples and refugees.
The well respected UN Special Raporteur, on human rights, Professor James Anaya states that the intervention is clearly discriminatory and puts Australia in breach of the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination, the international Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and the Declaration of the Rights of Indigenous Peoples.
Bess Price in a monosyllabic response to a question from Tony “I’ll take that as a comment” Jones said that he (I guess she meant the UN Raporteur) did not visit everyone, meaning I guess her.
He did hold a meeting at Tangentyere council which was an open forum, where he did meet people there after the forum. The question is, where were you Bess? You had every opportunity to ask a question and put your point of view, others there did so.
There has been many forums in Alice Springs where you could put your point of view, but have chosen not to, “better to keep ones mouth shut and be thought a fool, than to open it and leave no doubt”.
When you buy a burger it comes with a meat patty, piece of cheese, tomato, lettuce, pickle, and some secret sacred spices & sauces.
The National Aboriginal Congress is just a hamburger bun without the filling. It’s a “Nothing Burger “, empty nothing on the bun, until now. With the election of Lez Malezer we may see some good policy advice.
With only 2000 members representing Aboriginal folk and only 60% voting hardly a true representation of Aboriginal people, or the term “first nations people’’ which they prefer.
If you are an organisation it’s ok, you can come in and vote. If you are a blackfella at woop woop, sorry the organisation down the road voters for you. The sooner there is a model where every blackfella can vote on the day the sooner there is a true representative body.
Now the genie is out of the bottle. Les Malezer, has been elected from among the 60% of elite organisations to the Co-Chair position, and has already signaled his distaste and dislike for the Northern Territory Intervention.
It’s no good Senator Scullion – the Aboriginal opposition spokesman – bleating about Les Malezer’s position. Les Malezer has always fought for the rights of Aboriginal to have dignity and opportunity in the same way as other Australians have. There is nothing wrong with that view and in a democracy like ours, it’s refreshing to have a diverse view on the Congress advisory committee. The people that don’t like his view, or opposing views on other issues, should recognise his right to his opinion and his right as an individual to fight for it. Don’t let The Australian run the agenda.
Nigel Scullion has fired the first shots in a campaign which The Australian newspaper will relish. More fodder for the same old tired journalism. The Australian will trot out the few intervention supporters from their stable of black academics and also from the few community pro-interventionists, in coming weeks. They may even discover a few tweets.
They have already reported poor old Lowitja O’Donoghue haranguing Les Malezer over the Co-Chair position and she also urged him to spend more time fighting for Aboriginal rights within Australia rather than on the international stage. Well Lowitja, you almost had me at “hello” there. I must have missed something in the transcript.
Mr Malezer, a full-time delegate to the UN Committee on Indigenous Issues, has developed a solid anti-Intervention position, particularly regarding the suspension of the Racial Discrimination Act. He is not the only one in the country and the world with this view. Tony Abbott is of the view that the Northern Territory is a failed state, and wants more Intervention for the Aboriginal people.
There is a smell about the next chapter of “shock and awe” now being planned by the Opposition and their mates, the “good old boys’’ from Alice Springs.
The blackfellas in cahoots with the Opposition need to be very careful here in supporting them and being manipulated by them. There are not many punitive measures left; just look to South Africa or even to pre-war Germany.
A new style Intervention won’t affect the whitefellas, the Intervention business managers, the NGO’s, the job networks, the tourist operators, the pubs, the clubs, the miners, the pastoralists, the rich suburbs of Darwin. They are doing very well living off the misery of black Australia . Imparja Television, hiding behind a black mask as it has now for many years is also “just one of the boys”.
Because Les Malezer and other committed people black and white want this despicable Intervention to end, he is being demonised as a non-believer. Well Les Malezer will not be intimidated by The Australian, “other blackfellas” or to withdraw into a nothing burger like the rest on Congress. He is there because he wants to do what he sees as the right thing to do.
Les has broken the mould in getting on to the Congress. The smarties thought they had worked out how to keep out people similar in ideology and rights as the last ATSIC Chair and Co-Chair.
Tom Calma was desperate to set up a process that would not rock the boat.
These people seem to forget that to make change you have to engage Aboriginal people. Aborigines have to get back on the streets to be heard. If I was Senator Scullion, I would not be worried about people wearing T-shirts with “stop the intervention” on them. I would be worried that they did not have “Burn Baby Burn” on them, and blackfellas massing on Sydney like they did in 1988.
Les Malezer slipped under the radar, he will be bombarded from sectors of the mainstream press as they demonise him and look under every stone. They will revisit his past just as they did with Geoff Clark and Sugar. Whitefellas don’t like blackfellas in this country; it’s part of their DNA.
Les needs to tread lightly and when asked a question give the Queensland response, where he grew up, use the same tangled syntax as old Joh Bjelke and say “Don’t you worry about that”.
The debate on Wild Rivers is has taken a backward step with the resignations of two of the advisory committee members, including the Chair of the Committee throwing in the towel and claiming the committee is no more than a rubber stamp for Labor, state and federally, to ensure that the Cape is opened up for future development.
Throwing in the towel is a boxing term and an acknowledgement of defeat. There may be only two resignations involved, but throwing in the towel doesn’t necessarily have to mean that they are defeated. Only that their argument hasn’t got the numbers. In situations like this, it may only need one person to throw in the towel for the issue to move on.
No need for a mass exodus as “blackfella’’ seem to do when they don’t want to lose face with their supporters. And the all too predictable “if you go bro I will go”. That is defeatism, mob-mentality and old politics. Instead it may mean you recognise early that consensus has not permeated around your position, or that the issue is not worth pursuing any more.
The same situation also comes into other committees and boards. When people feel frustrated they walk away, rather than get better at negotiating.
The earlier you can come to this point then the more likely you can put forward a position closer to your own position. By recognising this you can then move the discussion forward and not get into trench warfare over single and at times distracting issues.
Some boxing trainers have thrown in the towel early and ended the career of boxers. Others have benefited from the experience and gone on to fight another day and learn from their experience.
Throwing in the towel by the Chair and committee was obviously bought on by frustration because they were getting beat up by the Bligh government supporters on the board. It’s not unusual to set up so-called advisory committees to advise government; it’s a common strategy used to get their program through. My experience of over 20 years on various advisory groups is that when the chips are down and the advisory committee moves to a position that the government or a peak body doesn’t agree with, then irreparable wounds open up and good people step away, leaving long-term relationships and respect for others on the advisory group in tatters. It does not worry the Bligh government in this situation; they just appoint another couple of Jacky Jackys.
Already the recriminations have started, fueled by the mainstream press seeking to muddy the water by getting the view of pro-development lobby on the advisory committee.
The Cape has to develop, simple as that, any economist worth his or her salt will tell you that. Any person who has to drive those roads during the wet or dry will tell you that. Any kid with an Ipod or mobile phone will tell you that. Development is the key to building capacity in the communities of the Cape. The Cape is flat and stagnant in terms of what it can do and should be doing for the regional and national economy.
Imposing a Wild Rivers legislation on a resource rich Cape York and putting a cap on resources and locking up assets is just “looney”.
It’s obviously ill conceived, and in terms of the Aboriginal people, condemns them to subsistence living conditions seen only in the third world.
Government and business should recognise indigenous talent as a force in future development. Get out of this mindset that an ‘intervention’, ‘wild rivers’ or ‘income management’ will fix education, health, housing, and alcohol problems.
It’s the system that’s broken, stupid.
We need to abandon the welfare reform process, and Wild Rivers. Now that’s a good start then maybe we can see the Cape develop an economy of state and national importance.
It’s close to the growth centers of Asia, but that’s another story.
I was talking to ‘’old mate’’ It’s been a while, since I last saw him. He was in the usual place , reading the form guide. I have a system he said. Oh yeah! What’s that? “I said”. I will tell you because, I know you don’t punt, “he said” with a smile, knowing I would probably tell “old auntie’’ what his system was anyway.
I get all the race forms and look at the first three selections of each race. Then I go through and mark the best priced ones. I always look for a horse that no one else has selected in their tips, because that is usually the horse that is a big price and I put it in the multiples. I have had a lot of good luck using that system he said. It takes a bit of time to work out, but when it comes in I have a real good day.
As we yarned away, I asked him. What do you make of all this blackfella politics going on at the moment?”. That stuff that’s in the paper there today I said”. That’s the third day now that the Australian has been running with it.
He laughed and said. They have a good race form Bala. My system depends on the picks that are in the Australian. I got a lot of winners from there. He said, I only buy it for the race form. Costs me a bloody fortune and you need a wheelbarrow to carry it. They won’t let you just take the form out and leave the rest of the paper there you know. I throw it in the bin after I take out the form.
About all that black politics he said, there is a bigger game going on. There are so many of these blackfella academics, why are they hanging around blackfellas anyway, they should be in the mainstream with all the other academics. I got and old mate who is a boilermaker, he is not in the black boiler making industry, he is out their getting $2,500 a week, fly in fly out in the mainstream.
There is a long held principle among the working class, that you never put an academic on top or in charge of your organization, company or trade union. It seems to me that we haven’t learnt that lesson yet either. Since the collapse of ATSIC all of the fringe dwellers of Aboriginal politics who worked with government to bring them down, are now seen as the darlings of the press.
He looked at me and said. Talk about stupid “Black Politics”. The problem as I see it is with Aboriginal people is the culture. They like to pull each other down. Just like a bucket of Yabbies , every yabbie tries to climb over the other to get to the top of the bucket. They love to be known as “leader” builds their ego, makes them feel good. Talk about stupidity.
Reminds me of a story, he said ”. Many years ago, when I first retired the missus took me to Bali for a holiday and one day we went up to see the monkeys, big things with big fangs they are.
There are these huge warning signs,warning tourists not to feed the monkeys similar to the Crocodile warning signs you see up north. Well this woman ignored the signs and decided to feed the monkeys some bananas she had hidden away in her bag. She wanted to get some action photos. Well she got more that what she bargained for.
Within minutes , there were about 20 big angry brown and white monkeys around her grabbing at the bananas from her bag, climbing over her and wrenching the bag from her hands. She’s screaming the monkeys are rampaging. Luckily for the woman this Balinese lady came running over with a big stick and chased the monkeys away.
Pointing to the sign and screaming “she said” Can’t you read sign it say. “Don’t feed the monkeys”. she said “stupid white woman”
I laughed as he told me that story. Yeah I thought old mate id probably right, all those Aboriginal mob are doing is feeding the monkeys of the press, starting off on Tony Jones Q&A. Tony Jones and the ABC have this unique way of starting something in Aboriginal affairs and walking away. Leaving a trail of destruction and providing the other monkeys in the main stream press the ammunition to attack and denigrate Aborigines.
As I said in previous blog, the content of what Bess Price said on Q&A lacked any substance what so ever, and is a warning to other blackfellas wanting to enter into what is now a vindictive and damaging debate, being run since the intervention, that had its genesis in the Tony Jones “late line” report on May 15, 2006 of reports of domestic violence in Aboriginal communities, compiled in a dossier on domestic violence by the Crown Prosecutor for central Australia, Nanette Rogers.
The genie was out of the bottle and has been unstoppable. Jones followed up with interviews with reporting that “babies had been raped and molested” Brough also said such incidents were wide spread “wherever there are aboriginal communities”
That’s why people are angry Bess, they are angry at you and all of your supporters for being so naive to be manipulated by the press and for bringing all of this sorrow contempt and shame on them.
The intervention was built on a lie, and the effects are now being felt in every town and town camp across the Northern Territory, Queensland and South Australia. Aboriginal people are moving off country to the towns and cities, not to drink but to survive the harsh conditions put on them by the intervention. The mining companies and the pastoralist continue with their wealth making and the freedom to do as they please.
Good on you the Australian. You have done the dirty work for them.